{"id":11087,"date":"2026-09-04T11:05:37","date_gmt":"2026-09-04T03:05:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/?p=11087"},"modified":"2026-09-04T11:05:37","modified_gmt":"2026-09-04T03:05:37","slug":"deburring-vs-grinding","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/deburring-vs-grinding\/","title":{"rendered":"Deburring vs Grinding: What Is the Actual Difference?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Deburring removes unwanted edge artifacts, burrs left behind by cutting, stamping and casting processes, without meaningfully changing the part itself. Grinding removes base material from the workpiece to change its dimensions, shape or surface finish. One cleans up the edge; the other reshapes the body. That single distinction drives tooling choice, tolerance strategy, cycle time and cost, and getting it wrong in either direction produces scrap.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here is the short version before we go deeper.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1536\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/2-deburring-vs-grinding-tech.png\" alt=\"Diagram of burr trim versus stock removal grinding\" class=\"wp-image-11076\" title=\"\" srcset=\"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/2-deburring-vs-grinding-tech.png 1536w, https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/2-deburring-vs-grinding-tech-300x200.png 300w, https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/2-deburring-vs-grinding-tech-1024x683.png 1024w, https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/2-deburring-vs-grinding-tech-768x512.png 768w, https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/2-deburring-vs-grinding-tech-18x12.png 18w, https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/2-deburring-vs-grinding-tech-600x400.png 600w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1536px) 100vw, 1536px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Deburring vs Grinding at a Glance<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Comparison point<\/th><th>Deburring<\/th><th>Grinding<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Primary purpose<\/td><td>Remove burrs, slag and sharp edges left by upstream processes<\/td><td>Remove base material to change dimensions, shape or surface geometry<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>What is removed<\/td><td>Edge artifacts only, typically tenths of a millimeter<\/td><td>Body material, from fractions of a millimeter to several millimeters<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Typical tooling<\/td><td>Carbide cutters, brushes, ceramic media, flap wheels, files<\/td><td>Bonded abrasive wheels, belts, cup wheels, mounted points<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Effect on tolerances<\/td><td>Should be tolerance-neutral; edges cleaned, datum surfaces untouched<\/td><td>Deliberately changes dimensions; tolerance control is the whole point<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Typical equipment<\/td><td>Robotic deburring cells, vibratory finishers, brush machines, tumbling systems<\/td><td>Surface grinders, angle grinders, robotic grinding cells, belt machines<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Position in the process chain<\/td><td>Final finishing step, after cutting, machining or casting<\/td><td>Intermediate or conditioning step, often before or alongside finishing<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Failure mode if misapplied<\/td><td>Residual burrs cause assembly interference, seal leaks and injuries<\/td><td>Over-cut scrapping, or insufficient removal leaving out-of-spec geometry<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both processes use abrasive media, both create sparks and dust, and both show up in finishing departments, which is why shops conflate them. The table draws the line where the engineering actually lives: which material you are allowed to remove. A deburring operation that eats into the part wall is no longer deburring. A grinding operation that only kisses the edge is not doing its job.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Deburring Actually Means<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Related precision comparisons: <a href=\"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/honing-vs-polishing\/\">honing vs polishing<\/a> for bore finishing and <a href=\"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/lapping-vs-polishing\/\">lapping vs polishing<\/a> when flatness is the spec.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A burr is a raised edge or sliver of material that mechanically adheres to a workpiece after a cutting, forming or casting operation. Drill a hole and the exit side pushes out a rolled lip. Stamp a blank and the punch shears the edge into a rolled crest. Cast a housing and die parting lines flash a thin fin of metal along the split. Machine a pocket and the cutter leaves a corner feather. None of this is part of the design intent, and all of it has to come off before the part moves downstream.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Deburring is the removal of those artifacts, and the operative constraint is selectivity. A good deburring process takes the burr and nothing else. The corner edge breaks, the hole rim cleans up, the parting line fin disappears, and every functional surface, every bore, every datum remains exactly where the machining operation put it. That is why deburring is described as tolerance-neutral when done correctly: the part that leaves the deburring station should be dimensionally identical to the one that entered, minus its burrs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The reasons shops deburr are practical, not cosmetic:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Assembly interference.<\/strong> A burr on a mating face or inside a bolt hole prevents parts from seating. In high-volume automotive and appliance production, burr-related fit problems stop lines.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Sealing integrity.<\/strong> Burrs on sealing surfaces of gearbox housings, hydraulic manifolds and brake components create leak paths that no gasket fully compensates for.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Safety.<\/strong> Sheet metal and machined edges with heavy burrs cut hands during handling, which matters both on the shop floor and at the end customer.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Downstream tool damage.<\/strong> Burrs shed chips into automated assembly and inspection stations, damaging probes, grippers and fixtures.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Coating and finish quality.<\/strong> Paint, plating and anodizing build up over burrs and then crack off when the burr flexes or breaks.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If you are new to the process, our <a href=\"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/what-is-robotic-deburring\/\">guide to robotic deburring<\/a> covers the equipment side in depth, from spindle-based cutting to compliant brushing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Grinding Actually Means<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Grinding uses bonded abrasive, wheels, belts, cups or points, to cut material from the workpiece body at high speed. Unlike deburring, which targets artifacts, grinding targets the workpiece itself: removing the gate and riser stubs from a casting, taking down a weld bead, flattening a warped face, bringing a bore into round, or hitting a dimensional spec that the upstream process could not hold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The distinction that matters in grinding is stock removal versus finishing. Heavy grinding, the kind that rips gates off die castings or scales down an oversized boss, is measured in millimeters of removal per pass. Precision grinding, the kind that holds a bearing journal to a few microns, is measured in thousandths. Both are grinding because both intentionally change the workpiece. The abrasive grain, aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, cubic boron nitride or diamond, functions as thousands of tiny cutting points, each taking a small chip of base material.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Grinding earns its place in a process chain when:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>The upstream process cannot hold the tolerance.<\/strong> Casting leaves gates, flash and dimensional drift; grinding brings the part back into spec.<\/li>\n<li><strong>A feature must be conditioned for a downstream operation.<\/strong> Sealing surfaces on gearbox housings get ground flat before assembly so the gasket can do its job.<\/li>\n<li><strong>A weld or joint must be dressed flush.<\/strong> Structural and cosmetic welds alike get ground to blend the joint into the parent material.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Surface finish requirements exceed what cutting can deliver.<\/strong> Grinding produces predictable finish ranges that machining may not reach economically.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The process is covered in detail in our <a href=\"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/robotic-grinding-guide\/\">robotic grinding guide<\/a>, which walks through force control, wheel selection and programming strategy for foundry and machining applications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Where Both Live on the Same Part: Casting Post-Processing<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The cleanest way to see the difference is to look at a single die-cast component as it exits the mold, because it needs both processes, usually back to back.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A cast gearbox housing comes out of the die with a chunk of runner and gate where the metal entered, riser stubs where it fed, and a thin fin of flash along the parting line. The gates and risers are base material attached to the part body, several millimeters of aluminum that the design does not call for. Removing them is grinding: you are cutting into the casting, changing its local shape and dimensions, bringing the gate area back toward nominal geometry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The parting line flash is different. It is a thin artifact, a fraction of a millimeter thick, clinging to an edge that is otherwise correct. Taking it off is deburring: the underlying edge geometry is left alone, and the part is simply cleaned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In manual foundry operations these two steps are often done by the same worker with the same angle grinder, which is one reason the terms blur together. In automated cells they are deliberately separated, because the force, tooling and programming strategy for hogging off a gate have nothing in common with the light, compliant pass that cleans a parting line. We break down how a single robotic line sequences these operations in our article on <a href=\"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/deburring-automation-die-casting\/\">deburring automation for die casting<\/a>, which covers gate removal, flash cleaning and channel finishing on one platform.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The same logic extends to machined parts. A milled aluminum bracket exits the machine with correct dimensions and rolled burrs on every tool exit edge. It needs deburring only. A sand-cast pump cover exits the shakeout with riser stubs, warpage and dimension drift. It needs grinding first, then deburring for the edges grinding leaves behind. Diagnosis starts with what the defect actually is: artifact or geometry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Engineering Threshold: When Deburring Stops Being Enough<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Shops ask a version of the same question on every new part: can we just deburr this, or does it need grinding? The honest answer is that it depends on how much material has to come off, and there is a workable rule of thumb.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Burrs created by cutting and stamping processes typically measure from a few micrometers up to around 0.1 to 0.2 mm in height. Heavy operations, plasma cutting slag, coarse casting flash, coarse punching on thick plate, can push the artifact into the 0.3 to 0.5 mm range and occasionally beyond. That 0.3 to 0.5 mm band is roughly where the crossover sits: edge artifacts in that range are usually too thick for brushes and compliant tooling to remove cleanly in a single economic pass, yet thin enough that a grinding pass risks eating more of the base material than the problem warrants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision logic works like this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Under roughly 0.1 mm:<\/strong> standard deburring territory. Brushes, flap wheels, carbide deburring tools and vibratory finishing all handle this reliably at high throughput.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Roughly 0.1 to 0.3 mm:<\/strong> still deburring, but you move to cutting tooling, a spindle-mounted carbide cutter with controlled depth, rather than surface-contact media. Cycle time and tool wear start to matter.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Roughly 0.3 to 0.5 mm and above:<\/strong> the gray zone. Thick flash and heavy slag respond to aggressive brushing or light grinding; the choice depends on part tolerance. If the edge has a tight dimensional spec, grinding with programmed depth control is safer than forcing a brush to do cutting work it was not designed for.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Multiple millimeters of attached stock:<\/strong> gates, risers, weld caps, oversize machining allowance. This is unambiguously grinding. No deburring tooling is meant to remove bulk material.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Two cautions keep this honest. First, the thresholds are material-dependent: the same 0.4 mm slag on mild steel plate behaves differently than 0.4 mm flash on die-cast aluminum, so treat the bands as starting points for a process trial, not gospel. Second, artifact thickness is not the only variable, accessibility, edge tolerance and part value push the decision in both directions. A cheap bracket with a loose tolerance can absorb an aggressive pass that an expensive precision casting cannot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For a fuller map of which machine classes handle which artifact classes, see our <a href=\"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/deburring-machine-types-guide\/\">deburring machine types guide<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Equipment Overlap and the Case for Shared Platforms<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here is where the boundary gets commercially interesting: the same robotic hardware can run both processes. A six-axis robot with a spindle, force control and a tool changer is process-agnostic. Mount a carbide burr tool and program a light, compliant path along the part edges and it is a deburring cell. Mount an abrasive wheel or belt unit and program material-removal passes across the gate zone and it is a grinding cell. Mount both on a tool changer and sequence the programs, and it finishes the whole part in one setup.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This is not a niche trick. In die casting and machining shops, mixed artifact profiles on a single part are the norm, so single-platform flexibility is often the deciding factor in automation payback:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Shared motion infrastructure.<\/strong> One robot, one controller, one safety enclosure and one part fixture serve both processes. The capital duplicates nothing.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Tool changers switch process in seconds.<\/strong> A dual-spindle setup with a tool-changing rack moves from gate grinding to edge deburring between features of the same part.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Force control is the common denominator.<\/strong> Whether holding a brush at constant normal force against an edge or a wheel at constant grind pressure against a face, the control problem is the same, and one platform&#8217;s tuning transfers.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Fixturing cost amortizes once.<\/strong> Parts that need both processes otherwise require two machines, two fixtures and two load-unload cycles.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The limits of the overlap are just as real. Wheel-based grinding at meaningful stock removal rates generates reaction forces and abrasive waste that a light deburring spindle cannot handle, so a shared platform must be sized for the heavier duty. Spindle power, robot payload, enclosure rating for abrasive dust and coolant management all get specified by the grinding side of the process pair, not the deburring side. If a cell will only ever deburr machined parts with sub-0.1 mm burrs, buying grinding-grade infrastructure wastes money. Our <a href=\"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/produit\/6-axis-deburring-equipment\/\">6-axis robotic deburring equipment page<\/a> details the specifications for the lighter end of this spectrum, where the majority of machined-part work lives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What Happens When You Use One for the Other<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The two failure directions are not symmetric, and both are expensive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Grinding where you should deburr.<\/strong> An operator or programmer attacks a 0.15 mm edge burr with a grinding wheel and removes it in one pass, along with 0.3 mm of the adjacent face. The burr is gone; so is the tolerance. On a sealing face, the part now leaks. On a bearing bore edge, the chamfer is gone and the bearing seat is compromised. On a bracket foot, the pad no longer sits flat. The scrap does not announce itself immediately, either, parts pass visual inspection and fail at assembly or at the customer, which is the most expensive place to discover them. The root cause is almost always a missing constraint: nobody told the operator or the program which surfaces were off-limits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Deburring where you should grind.<\/strong> A 2 mm gate stub gets attacked with a brush or a flap wheel. The tool glazes, the cycle runs long, tool consumption explodes, and the stub comes down unevenly, leaving a scalloped, work-hardened mound that now needs more aggressive rework than the original problem. The part ships late and still needs grinding afterward. The cost shows up as consumables, cycle time and schedule slip rather than scrap, which makes it quieter and more chronic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The pattern in both directions is the same: nobody made the artifact-versus-geometry diagnosis explicitly. The fix is a two-question check on every new part. What exactly has to come off, an edge artifact or base material? And how much of it is there? Those two answers select the process, and the thresholds above do the rest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Real production examples make the stakes concrete. On a <a href=\"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/gearbox-housing-robotic-grinding-solution\/\">gearbox housing robotic grinding application<\/a>, the sealing plane and gate zone demand programmed abrasive removal to restore flatness, grinding work, while the bearing bore edges and bolt holes only need light edge breaking afterward, deburring work. The two are quoted, tooled and programmed separately even though one robot does both. A <a href=\"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/brake-caliper-robotic-grinding-solution\/\">brake caliper robotic grinding line<\/a> splits the same way: pad abutment faces get ground to spec, casting flash on the outer body gets brushed off, and mixing the two passes would either scrap calipers or leave flash in place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Automation View: One Robot, Both Processes<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Manual grinding and manual deburring live in the same corner of the shop for a reason: they are physically demanding, dusty, repetitive and hard to staff, and every safety and labor pressure pushes them toward automation. Robotic cells address both, but the automation rationale differs slightly between them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For <strong>deburring<\/strong>, the automation driver is consistency. Manual deburring quality varies with every shift and every operator, and burr-related escapees reach assembly no matter how diligent the inspection. A robot with force-controlled tooling produces the same edge break on the ten-thousandth part as on the first, which is precisely what assembly and sealing operations need. Throughput gains matter, but repeatability is usually what closes the business case. Machined-part deburring in particular, prismatic parts with predictable tool-exit burrs, is the most automatable case in the entire finishing family, because the burr locations are deterministic outputs of the machining program.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For <strong>grinding<\/strong>, the automation driver is capability plus condition. Manual grinding of gates and welds depends on the operator&#8217;s eye and arm; robotic grinding with active force control holds grind pressure constant as the part-to-part geometry drifts, and it does so inside an enclosure that keeps the noise, dust and wheel-burst risk away from people. Foundry grinding, die castings, sand castings, forged components, is where the payback concentrates, because the manual version of that job is among the least desirable on the floor and the part volumes are high.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The convergence point is the mixed part. When one component needs both gate grinding and edge deburring, a single robotic platform with process-sequenced programs and tool changing beats two dedicated machines on capital, floor space and handling. This is the architecture we return to throughout the site, starting from the <a href=\"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/what-is-robotic-deburring\/\">robotic deburring fundamentals page<\/a>, because it collapses the artificial boundary between the two processes at the equipment level while keeping it rigid at the process-planning level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The boundary, in other words, belongs in the engineering, not in the hardware. Diagnose artifact versus geometry, size the removal, pick the process, then let the robot execute both.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Is deburring a type of grinding?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. Both use abrasive media in some configurations, but they have different targets. Grinding removes base material from the workpiece body to change dimensions, shape or surface geometry. Deburring removes edge artifacts, burrs, slag, flash, without meaningfully altering the part itself. A process that removes workpiece body material is grinding regardless of the tool used, and a process that only cleans edges is deburring regardless of how aggressive it looks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Can one machine do both deburring and grinding?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A robotic cell can, with the right configuration. A six-axis robot with adequate spindle power, force control and an automatic tool changer can run a grinding wheel for material removal and switch to a carbide cutter or brush for edge finishing within the same cycle. Dedicated fixed machines generally cannot cross over, a vibratory finisher will never remove a casting gate, and a surface grinder is the wrong tool for hole-edge burrs. The platform has to be specified for the heavier process, which is grinding in most mixed applications.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which comes first, grinding or deburring?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Grinding almost always precedes deburring when a part needs both. Bulk material removal, gates, risers, weld dressing, restructures the surfaces and creates fresh edges and often new burrs in the process, so edge cleanup comes last. Deburring is typically the final operation before washing, inspection or assembly. The exception is process-intermediate deburring between machining operations, where a burr from a roughing pass must come off before a finishing pass can run.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How much material can deburring remove?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As a working range, conventional deburring tooling handles edge artifacts from a few micrometers up to roughly 0.3 mm, with cutting-type tools pushing toward the top of that band and brushes and media working the bottom. In the 0.3 to 0.5 mm range the processes blur, and above that the removal job belongs to grinding tooling. The numbers shift with material, aluminum flash comes off more readily than hardened steel burr, so treat the range as a starting point for process validation on the actual part.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why does the difference matter for part cost?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Because misassignment scrap on one side and burns consumables on the other. Grinding a part that only needed deburring risks over-cutting functional surfaces and scrapping expensive work late in the process, when its accumulated value is highest. Deburring a part that needed grinding glazes tools, stretches cycle times and still leaves the part out of spec for a second operation. Getting the artifact-versus-geometry diagnosis right the first time is one of the cheapest quality controls available in a finishing operation.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Deburring trims edge protrusions; grinding removes stock to change shape. Compare purpose, tools, tolerances, and when castings need both on one robotic line.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":11075,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11087","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-technical-guides"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11087","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11087"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11087\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11088,"href":"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11087\/revisions\/11088"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11075"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11087"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11087"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roboticpolishingtech.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11087"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}